Wells Fargo and Merrill Lynch Lose Financial Advisors to Stifel 

Accelerating its recruiting efforts, Stifel recruited six wirehouse advisors who managed $573 million. The regional BD’s new hires — all from Wells Fargo except one — cap off a period of aggressive hiring that has brought on a slew of advisors. Stifel CEO Ronald Kruszewski recently said that new recruits from the firm’s first quarter represented $32 million in net new production. The St. Louis-based firm reported having 2,160 advisors for the first quarter, up a net 43 from the year-ago period.

Source: Wells Fargo and Merrill Lynch lose financial advisors to Stifel Financial | On Wall Street

UBS Team Transitions to Rockefeller With $1 Billion

Rockefeller Capital Management landed a former UBS team that managed $1 billion to staff a new branch office, according to a person familiar with the group’s move. Bruce Tenenbaum and Andy Lam opened a new wealth management office for Rockefeller in San Francisco where they will cater to ultrahigh-net-worth clients, according to the firm which has focused on poaching top talent from wirehouses such as Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and UBS.

Read more.

Former Lehman CEO Dick Fuld hires $430 million team from Morgan Stanley 

Two former Morgan Stanley advisors who oversaw $430 million in client assets left the wirehouse to join a firm led by former Lehman Brothers CEO Richard Fuld.Fuld presided over a 2008 historic corporate collapse that contributed to the worst global financial crisis in nearly a century.Matrix Private Capital Group’s new hires — Scott Weissman and Thomas Bruce — are based in Chicago, according to the firm, which also has locations in Los Angeles, Pittsburgh, and Palm Beach, Florida.

Source: Former Lehman Brothers CEO Dick Fuld recruits advisors for asset manager from Morgan Stanley | On Wall Street

SEC, NASAA, and FINRA Issue Senior Safe Act Fact Sheet to Help promote Greater Reporting of Suspected Senior Financial Exploitation

In recognition of the one-year anniversary of the passage of The Senior Safe Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA), and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) have issued a fact sheet to help raise awareness among broker-dealers, investment advisers, and transfer agents of the Act and how the Act’s immunity provisions work.

The Senior Safe Act Fact Sheet provides information on the immunity and training provisions of the Act, as well as additional resources from the SEC, NASAA, and FINRA.

The Senior Safe Act was included as Section 303 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, which was signed into law on May 24, 2018. The Act addresses barriers financial professionals face in reporting suspected senior financial exploitation or abuse to authorities. Specifically, the Act protects “covered financial institutions” – which include investment advisers, broker-dealers, and transfer agents – and their eligible employees, affiliated persons, and associated persons (“eligible employees”), from liability in any civil or administrative proceeding for reporting a case of potential exploitation of a senior citizen to a covered agency. As an example, this immunity can be helpful when a firm wants to report potential exploitation but fears that the report could violate a privacy requirement.

The immunity established by the Act is provided on the condition that employees receive training on how to identify and report exploitative activity against seniors before making a report. In addition, reports of suspected exploitation must be made “in good faith” and “with reasonable care.” This immunity applies to individuals and firms.

“Financial professionals can provide a critical frontline role in identifying and reporting senior financial exploitation,” said SEC Chairman Jay Clayton.  “The SEC strongly encourages broker-dealers and investment advisers to train their personnel in accordance with the Senior Safe Act. We also encourage all investors, including our most vulnerable, to ensure they are dealing with a registered investment professional.”

“In reminding broker-dealers and investment advisers of the Senior Safe Act’s important immunity provisions, we hope to encourage firms to train their employees on how to detect and report suspected senior financial exploitation. Early detection and reporting are critical to help prevent elder financial abuse and the devastating financial and emotional impacts that ensue,” said Michael S. Pieciak, NASAA President and Vermont Commissioner of Financial Regulation.

“Protecting senior investors has long been a top priority for FINRA,” said FINRA President and CEO Robert Cook. “The Senior Safe Act seeks to empower financial professionals to detect and report cases of suspected abuse of senior investors and we believe it is important to broaden awareness and understanding of the Act throughout the securities industry.”

The Senior Safe Act Fact Sheet is available on the SEC’s website, NASAA’s website, NASAA’s Serve Our Seniors website, and FINRA’s website.

About the SEC:

The mission of the SEC is to protect investors; maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets; and facilitate capital formation. The SEC strives to promote a market environment that is worthy of the public’s trust.

About NASAA:

Formed in 1919, NASAA is the non-profit association of state, provincial, and territorial securities regulators in the United States, Canada and Mexico. NASAA has 67 members, including the securities regulators in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. NASAA’s U.S. members are responsible for administering state securities laws, commonly known as “Blue Sky Laws.” For more information, visit: www.nasaa.org.

About FINRA:

FINRA is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to investor protection and market integrity. It regulates one critical part of the securities industry – brokerage firms doing business with the public in the United States. FINRA, overseen by the SEC, writes rules, examines for and enforces compliance with FINRA rules and federal securities laws, registers broker-dealer personnel and offers them education and training, and informs the investing public. In addition, FINRA provides surveillance and other regulatory services for equities and options markets, as well as trade reporting and other industry utilities. FINRA also administers a dispute resolution forum for investors and brokerage firms and their registered employees. For more information, visit www.finra.org.

Contacts:

SEC
Office of Public Affairs
202-551-4125 news@sec.gov

NASAA
Bob Webster, Director of Communications
202-737-0900 | bw@nassa.org

FINRA
Angelita Plemmer Williams
Director, Media Relations, FINRA
202-728-8988

***

Senior Safe Act Fact Sheet

Introduction

The Senior Safe Act became federal law on May 24, 2018.[1]  The Senior Safe Act does not mandate any action by financial institutions and regulators.  However, for financial institutions and certain eligible employees (discussed below), affiliated persons, and associated persons (“eligible employees”), who satisfy its requirements, the Senior Safe Act provides immunity from liability in any civil or administrative proceeding for reporting potential exploitation of a senior citizen.  As an example, this immunity can be helpful when a firm wants to report potential exploitation but fears that the report could violate a privacy requirement.  This Fact Sheet provides general information regarding the Senior Safe Act with the goal of educating financial institutions and employees about the benefits of the Act.[2] 

What is the Senior Safe Act?

The Senior Safe Act protects “covered financial institutions”[3] – which include investment advisers, broker-dealers, and transfer agents – and their eligible employees, from liability in any civil or administrative proceeding in instances where those employees make a report about the potential exploitation of a senior citizen (defined as not younger than 65 years) to a covered  agency.[4]  The immunity established by the Senior Safe Act is provided on the condition that (1) certain employees (discussed below) receive training on how to identify and report exploitative activity against seniors before making a report, and (2) reports of suspected exploitation are made “in good faith” and “with reasonable care.”  This immunity applies to eligible employees and firms, but the requirements differ slightly, as discussed below.

The inspiration for the Senior Safe Act was Maine’s Senior$afe training program, an initiative launched in 2014 by the Maine Council on Elder Abuse Prevention that is designed to train financial professionals to detect and report cases of suspected senior financial abuse.

What types of employees are eligible for immunity under the Senior Safe Act?

  1. An employee who serves as a supervisor or in a compliance or legal function (including as a Bank Secrecy Act officer), for a covered financial institution; OR
     
  2. A registered representative, investment adviser representative, or insurance producer affiliated or associated with a covered financial institution.

What types of employees must be trained to receive the immunity provided by the Senior Safe Act?

The Senior Safe Act does not mandate that any employees be trained.  However, to qualify for the immunity provided by the law, training must be provided to and completed by the employees who are eligible for immunity (see above) and those employees who may come into contact with a senior citizen as a regular part of their professional duties or may review or approve the financial documents, records, or transactions of a senior citizen in connection with providing financial services to a senior citizen.

What are the training requirements under the Senior Safe Act?

The Senior Safe Act provides that, to receive the immunity provided by the Act, the training must: (1) instruct any individual attending the training on how to identify and report the suspected exploitation of a senior citizen internally and, as appropriate, to government officials or law enforcement authorities, including common signs that indicate the financial exploitation of a senior citizen; (2) discuss the need to protect the privacy and respect the integrity of each individual customer of the covered financial institution; and (3) be appropriate to the job responsibilities of the individual attending the training.

How soon must employees be trained to receive the immunity provided by the Senior Safe Act?

For current employees, affiliated persons, and associated persons, as soon as reasonably practical.  New employees or persons who become affiliated or associated with a covered financial institution have no later than one year from the date of hire, affiliation, or association to complete the training.

What records of training must be maintained?

Records of employees who completed the training and the content of the training must be maintained by the covered financial institution and made available to a covered agency with examination authority over the covered financial institution, upon request, except that a covered financial institution shall not be required to maintain or make available such content with respect to any individual who is no longer employed by or affiliated or associated with the covered financial institution.

How do the requirements for “individual immunity” and “institutional immunity” differ?

An eligible employee who has received the training and makes a disclosure to a covered agency in good faith and with reasonable care receives individual immunity pursuant to the Senior Safe Act.  A covered financial institution also receives institutional immunity when an eligible employee makes a disclosure to a covered agency and all employees have received training to the extent necessary to qualify for immunity under the Senior Safe Act.

Does the immunity provided by the Senior Safe Act allow for contacting third parties?

No, the qualified immunity established by the Senior Safe Act applies only to disclosures made by a covered financial institution or an employee of such institution to a “covered agency,” not a third party.

Where can I find additional information?

SEC Resources:
SEC Seniors webpage

NASAA Resources:
Serve Our Seniors website

FINRA Resources:
FINRA’s Senior Investors webpage
Regulatory Notice 17-11, SEC Approves Rules Relating to Financial Exploitation of Seniors (March 2017)
FINRA Securities Helpline for Seniors: 844-57-HELPS (844-574-3577)
FINRA Securities Helpline for Seniors webpage
Report on the FINRA Securities Helpline for Seniors (December 2015)
Protecting Seniors From Financial Exploitation (April 25, 2018)
FINRA Investor Alerts


[1] The Senior Safe Act, which was included as Section 303 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, was signed into law on May 24, 2018.

[2] This document should not be construed as providing legal advice.

[3] The Senior Safe Act defines the term “covered financial institution” as credit unions, depository institutions, investment advisers, broker-dealers, insurance companies, insurance agencies, and transfer agents.

[4] The Senior Safe Act defines the term “covered agency” to include a state financial regulatory authority (including a state securities regulator or law enforcement authority and a state insurance regulator); a state or local adult protective services agency; the SEC; an SEC-registered national securities association (e.g., FINRA); a federal law enforcement agency; or any Federal agency represented in the membership of the Financial Institutions Examination Council.  

SEC Press Release

— Looking for a securities lawyer for litigation, arbitration or an SEC or FINRA Investigation?, email Mark Astarita or call 212-509-6544 to speak to a securities lawyer.

from Blogger http://bit.ly/2Qjt9pD

$530 Mill Team Leaves UBS

A UBS team with $530 million in client assets quit the wirehouse to open their own independent firm, using the Dynasty platform, and Schwab as custodian.

Looking to leave a wirehouse and become independent? Call our office at 212-509-6544

Supreme Court Cases on First Amendment Rights Coming Up | Fortune

The Supreme Court begins its new term on Monday and people are using words like “blockbuster” and “epic” to describe the upcoming series of cases. This is largely because the court will begin the term at full strength—prior to the confirmation of conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch last spring, the court had been reluctant to take hot button cases for fear of a four-four tie.The most high profile cases in the new term include ones about cell phone privacy and the legality of partisan gerrymandering. But the Supreme Court will also make a number of divisions that will have huge implications for companies business. Below are five of the most important business cases the top court will hear in coming months. Keep in mind too the court has only filled about half its schedule—meaning more big business cases are on the way.

Source: Supreme Court Cases on First Amendment Rights Coming Up | Fortune

Posted in Law

Citigroup Paying $18 Million for Overbilling Clients

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Citigroup Global Markets has agreed to pay $18.3 million to settle charges that it overbilled investment advisory clients and misplaced client contracts. The SEC’s order finds that at least 60,000 advisory clients were overcharged approximately $18 million in unauthorized fees because Citigroup failed to confirm the accuracy of billing rates entered into its computer systems in comparison to fee rates outlined in client contracts, billing histories.

If you are a Citigroup customer who was overcharged, or a Citigroup broker with clients who were overcharged by the firm, give us a call – 973-559-5566. We represent customers and brokers in securities related matters nationwide.

Source: SEC.gov | Citigroup Paying $18 Million for Overbilling Clients

Five Busted Myths About Investing


This article from Forbes explains what the author believes are common investment myths. Follow the link to the article. While we are not so sure that we agree with all of this, but we present it for your review and consideration.


1. You know what you’re buying when you buy an ETF.

2. Stocks are risky.

3. Bonds are safe.

4. Stock investing is easy.

5. Options are speculative and dangerous.

Source: Five Busted Myths About Investing

Appaloosa sues to block SunEdison unit from buying Vivint assets

David Tepper-led hedge fund Appaloosa Managemen sued to prevent SunEdison’s yieldco from taking over some of Vivint Solar’s assets after SunEdison acquires the rooftop panel installer.

The yieldco, TerraForm Power, is to acquire Vivint’s residential solar rooftop portfolio after SunEdison completes the Vivint transaction.

Appaloosa is seeking “immediate injunctive relief”, given that SunEdison’s acquisition of Vivint could close “at any time,” the hedge fund said in a filing in a Delaware court on Tuesday.

Tepper goes after TerraForm Power, SunEdisonSunEdison shares fell about 10 percent in morning trading, while TerraForm Power’s shares rose about 2 percent.

Appaloosa has repeatedly said the acquisition of Vivint’s assets by TerraForm Power was not in the interest of the yieldco’s shareholders.Funds affiliated with Appaloosa together owned 9.5 percent of the outstanding class A shares of TerraForm Power as of December.

Source: Appaloosa sues to block SunEdison unit from buying Vivint assets