SEC Charges Stericycle with Bribery Schemes in Latin America

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced charges against Stericycle, Inc. for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) arising out of bribery schemes that took place in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico. The company has agreed to…

Read the Full Press Release


Have a securities law question? Call New York Securities Lawyers at 212-509-6544.

Atlanta-Based Pest Control Company, Former CFO Charged with Improper Earnings Management

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Rollins Inc. agreed to pay $8 million to settle charges that it engaged in improper accounting practices in order to boost its publicly-reported quarterly earnings per share (EPS) to meet…

Read the Full Press Release


Have a securities law question? Call New York Securities Lawyers at 212-509-6544.

SEC Obtains TRO and Asset Freeze against Alleged Perpetrators of nearly $450 Million Ponzi Scheme

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced charges and an asset freeze against several Las Vegas-area individuals and companies allegedly behind a nearly half-billion dollar Ponzi scheme involving purported personal injury settlements. The…

Read the Full Press Release


Have a securities law question? Call New York Securities Lawyers at 212-509-6544.

Fee Rate Advisory #1 for Fiscal Year 2022

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that starting on May 14, 2022, the fee rates applicable to most securities transactions will be set at $22.90 per $1 million.  Consequently, each SRO will continue to pay the Commission a rate…

Read the Full Press Release


Have a securities law question? Call New York Securities Lawyers at 212-509-6544.

SEC Proposes Amendments to Remove References to Credit Ratings from Regulation M

The Securities and Exchange Commission today voted to propose changes that would remove the references to credit rating agencies from existing exceptions provided in Rule 101 and Rule 102 of Regulation M, a set of rules designed to preserve market…

Read the Full Press Release


Have a securities law question? Call New York Securities Lawyers at 212-509-6544.

SEC Examing Crypto as Securities

The SEC is attempting to gain regulatory oversight of cryptocurrency products and platforms that may be engaging in the sale and offering of securities. Securities are strictly regulated and require detailed disclosures to inform investors of potential risks. Since the first cryptocurrency (Bitcoin) launched in 2009, the question of how exactly to fit the components of this new, decentralized financial ecosystem into traditional categories has been widely debated.

Are Cryptocurrencies Securities?

The SEC has long held that an “investment contract” is the basic definition of a security. But tokens are not investment contracts.

The difficulty in answering the question is the fact that not all cryptocurrencies are the same. But since terms like “coin,” “token,” “currency,” and “asset” are regularly used interchangeably to describe the thousands of products under the “cryptocurrency” umbrella, we can’t categorize them based on nomenclature alone. Instead, one must look at function.

We discussed the various definitions of a “security” in our What is a Security article. The basic definition is “an investment of money in a common enterprise with profits to come solely from the efforts of others; and, if that test be satisfied, it is immaterial whether the enterprise is speculative or non-speculative, or whether there is a sale of property with or without intrinsic value”. SEC v. Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293 (1946)

The SEC has stated that cryptocurrencies like bitcoin are not securities. This includes cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, and Litecoin.

However, the SEC Chair Gary Gensler said, in August 2021, that the SEC considers many cryptocurrency coins and tokens to be securities under the Howey Test, saying, “If somebody is raising money selling a token and the buyer is anticipating profits based on the efforts of that group to sponsor the seller, that fits into something that’s a security.”

Of course, now we are mixing the concept of the actual token as a security with the manner in which the token is marketed, but this will all shake out.

Unfortunately, we will get clarity in the worst possible way. Rather than propose regulations, the SEC has decided to create regulation by litigation, exposing market participants to lawsuits, and the expense of time and money for conduct which was not a violation when conducted.

Reuters has an article which contains an overview of the SEC’s recent litigation attempts to regulate crypto.

SEC: Takeover Bid of Fortune 500 Company was a Sham

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Melville ten Cate, a U.S. citizen residing abroad, with fraud stemming from his allegedly phony offer to purchase Textron – a large U.S.-listed aircraft, defense, and industrial company.  The SEC…

Read the Full Press Release


Have a securities law question? Call New York Securities Lawyers at 212-509-6544.

SEC Proposes Rules for the Registration and Regulation of Security-Based Swap Execution Facilities

The Securities and Exchange Commission today proposed new Regulation SE under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) to create a regime for the registration and regulation of security-based swap execution facilities (SBSEFs). The new…

Read the Full Press Release


Have a securities law question? Call New York Securities Lawyers at 212-509-6544.

Experts Examiner Newsletter

The Securities Experts Roundtable is a group of securities expert witnesses that provides continuing professional education and promotes ethics and integrity among its members. 

It publishes a quarterly newsletter which provides commentary on securities arbitration issues, with a slighly different viewpoint from our securities litigator perspective.

I have used, worked with and cross-examined many of their members, all of whom are well qualified in their particular areas of expertise.

They just published their quarterly “Experts Examiner” newsletter which includes commentary and summaries of recent court cases.

Watch “Former SEC Chair on the Activision Blizzard investigation: Their actions were ‘just foolish'” on YouTube

Chairman Pitt makes a good point. These CEOs know better. Even if it was a social meeting and nothing was disclosed, making a significant trade after what meeting just invites an SEC investigation.

Or maybe they are convinced that “email traffic” will somehow prove that there was no confidential information disclosed.

But the appearance of impropriety is certainly there.