Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated has settled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for charging more than $4 million in undisclosed foreign exchange fees to its advisory clients for transfers to or from their accounts. The company has agreed to pay disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and a civil penalty of more than $9.5 million and distribute the funds to the affected clients.
Merrill Lynch’s failure to disclose additional fees to clients
Between May 2016 and July 2020, Merrill Lynch offered investment advisory services to its clients, where the clients paid a fee in exchange for a range of services, including foreign currency exchanges. Although Merrill Lynch disclosed that it charged a markup or markdown on foreign currency exchanges, it did not disclose an additional fee called a production credit, which was equal to or greater than the disclosed markup or markdown in more than 80 percent of the transactions. Merrill Lynch paid a percentage of these production credits to its financial advisors and called this charge a commission in internal documents.
Merrill Lynch’s violation of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
The SEC found that Merrill Lynch violated Sections 206(2) and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and related rules. Merrill Lynch has consented to the SEC’s order and agreed to a cease-and-desist order, a censure, and to pay disgorgement of around $4.1 million, prejudgment interest of $760,000, and a civil penalty of $4.8 million. Merrill Lynch has also agreed to distribute funds to harmed advisory clients.
The SEC’s Director of the New York Regional Office, Antonia M. Apps, said that investment advisers must ensure that they do not selectively disclose some fees but not others relating to a particular service. Merrill Lynch’s clients were left in the dark about the often larger fee charged on foreign currency exchanges, and they were charged millions of dollars in undisclosed fees.
SEC’s settlement with Merrill Lynch
Merrill Lynch’s failure to adopt and implement policies and procedures that were reasonably designed to prevent its disclosures from being misleading about the fees it charged on foreign currency exchanges is a violation of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Merrill Lynch has agreed to the SEC’s findings without admitting or denying them.
Have a securities law question? Call New York Securities Lawyers at 212-509-6544.
SECLaw.com is the online source of securities law new, tips and commentary. Online since 1995 it is the recognized leader in the area, so much so that other attorneys have been reduced to using “seclaw” in their website names in an effort to gain from the site’s popularity.