SEC Requests Comment on Potential Money Market Fund Reform Options Highlighted in President’s Working Group Report

The Securities and Exchange Commission today published a request for public comment on potential reform measures to improve the resilience of money market funds as highlighted in a report of the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets issued in…

Read the Full Press Release


Have a securities law question? Call Sallah Astarita & Cox at 212-509-6544.

* This article was originally published here

Posted in Uncategorized

SEC Charges Former Executives of San Francisco Bay Area Company With Accounting Violations

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Joseph Jackson and Colm Callan, respectively the former CEO and CFO of WageWorks Inc. with making false and misleading statements and omissions, including to the company’s auditors, that…

Read the Full Press Release


Have a securities law question? Call Sallah Astarita & Cox at 212-509-6544.

* This article was originally published here

Posted in Uncategorized

SEC Charges Three Individuals in Digital Asset Frauds

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged three individuals with defrauding hundreds of retail investors out of more than $11 million through two fraudulent and unregistered digital asset securities offerings. According to the SEC’s complaint…

Read the Full Press Release


Have a securities law question? Call Sallah Astarita & Cox at 212-509-6544.

The post SEC Charges Three Individuals in Digital Asset Frauds appeared first on SECLaw.com.

https://bit.ly/36AiGiV

* This article was originally published here

Posted in Uncategorized

You Should See This Document on JD Supra.

New York State is now requiring Investment Advisor Representatives who work in New York, or who have clients in New York, to register with the New York Investor Protection Bureau and meet certain exam requirements.

The new regulation goes into effect February 1, 2021.

* This article was originally published here

Posted in Uncategorized

Galvin (Mass.) Calls for Unheard of 30 Day Gamestop Trading Suspension

William Galvin, the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and its chief securities regulator told Barron’s that the trading in Gamestop should be halted for 30 days.

Of course, Secretary Galvin has no authority to halt the trading in any publicly listed stock. He also doesn't explain how preventing investors from selling their holdings protects investors, rather claiming, according to MarketWatch “These small and unsophisticated investors are probably going to get hurt by this.”
Yes, unsophisticated investors who think they can out trade market professionals are going to get hurt. That is a given and proven day in and day out by newbie day traders. However, a 30 days suspension in the trading of any stock because of rumors or events having nothing to do with the company itself is unheard of, and damages the market, and all investors.

* This article was originally published here

Posted in Uncategorized

South Korea Shows OECD How It’s Done In Covid-19 Era

Korea’s economy has posted one of the best performances by an Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development member amid the pandemic.Securities law question? Ask nationally known securities lawyer Mark Astarita, by phone or email. 212-509-6544 or mja@sallahlaw.com

The post South Korea Shows OECD How It’s Done In Covid-19 Era appeared first on SECLaw.com.

https://bit.ly/3pxhbK0

* This article was originally published here

Posted in Uncategorized

Can Robinhood Stop Trading in A Particular Stock?

In the aftermath of the run-up in the price of Gamestop (GME) Robinhood removed GME from its trading platform. Yes, Robinhood simply removed a publicly traded security from its platform, preventing its users from buying, and presumably selling, the security.

While Robinhood claims that it has the right to do so in its customer agreement,  that may not be the case. Many commentators are claiming that Robinhood has the right to reject orders, which is certainly true – depending on the reason. And the reason for rejecting orders typically relates to the customer or the order itself.

There is there is nothing in Robinhood’s customer that permits it to remove a publicly traded security from its platform, preventing customers from purchasing that security. 

Robinhood will undoubtedly attempt to rely on this sentence in the customer agreement:

I understand Robinhood may at any time, in its sole discretion and without prior notice to Me, prohibit or restrict My ability to trade securities.

It is doubtful that this provision, which is contained in a paragraph titled “Purchases” and discusses the customer’s obligation to pay for stock purchases, will support a claim that it can be used by the firm to prevent ALL customers from purchasing a particular security. 

In addition, Robinhood defines the word “My” and “Me” in the agreement to refer to the owner of the account in question. It does not give Robinhood the authority to prevent all customers from trading a particular security.

Another interesting point is that Robinhood did not stop trading because of some altruistic motive, it did so to protect its own profits, according to BloombergLaw. According to Bloomberglaw, Robinhood Chief Executive Officer Vlad Tenev said that the company’s financial requirements, such as deposits to clearing houses, increase when there’s a lot of volatility in the market, so “to protect the firm and to protect our customers we temporarily disabled buying in these securities.”

So, Robinhood removed the stock from its trading platform so that it would not have to pay its clearing firm (which is affiliated with the entity that owns the trading platform) from increasing its security deposits.

Adding another twist to the story,  the day after it removed Gamestop from its platform, and after being hit with a number of lawsuits, it reinstated Gamestop.
—-
Mark J. Astarita is a national securities attorney who has represented investors and brokerage firms for over 30 years, in a wide array of disputes and investigations, including short squeezers and bear raids. For more information, contact him at 212-509-6544 or by email at mja@sallahlaw.com

* This article was originally published here

Posted in Uncategorized

SEC Charges Vuuzle Media Corp. and Affiliated Individuals in Connection With $14 Million Offering Fraud

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Vuuzle Media Corporation, a purported online live streaming and entertainment company, and its founder Ronald Shane Flynn (a.k.a. Ronnie Shane) with fraudulently offering over $14 million in securities…

Read the Full Press Release


Have a securities law question? Call Sallah Astarita & Cox at 212-509-6544.

* This article was originally published here

Posted in Uncategorized

Manisha Kimmel to Conclude Tenure as Senior Policy Advisor to the Chair on the Consolidated Audit Trail

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Manisha Kimmel will conclude her tenure as Senior Policy Advisor, Regulatory Reporting, at the end of this month. Since joining the SEC in January 2019, Ms. Kimmel has coordinated the SEC’s…

Read the Full Press Release


Have a securities law question? Call Sallah Astarita & Cox at 212-509-6544.

* This article was originally published here

Posted in Uncategorized

The Market’s Size Premium Was The First To Be Discovered, Now Researchers Are Losing Faith

One of the first breaks with the idea of market efficiency was the discovery of a size premium. Now investors question it’s position as a key factor for investors.

* This article was originally published at The Securities Law B

The post The Market’s Size Premium Was The First To Be Discovered, Now Researchers Are Losing Faith appeared first on SECLaw.com.

https://bit.ly/3c9v6Ca

* This article was originally published here

Posted in Uncategorized